A typology of arguments about drone ethics
(Government Document, Online Content)
Author
Contributors
Published
Carlisle, PA : Strategic Studies Institute and U.S. Army War College Press, 2017.
Physical Desc
1 online resource (xi, 63 pages).
More Details
Published
Carlisle, PA : Strategic Studies Institute and U.S. Army War College Press, 2017.
Format
Government Document, Online Content
Language
English
Notes
General Note
"October 2017."
Bibliography
Includes bibliographical references (pages 53-63).
Description
SUMMARY. While there is widespread opposition to the acquisition and deployment of drones for both surveillance and combat units at the mass and elite levels, individuals and groups differ in the specifics of their arguments. Among domestic and international opponents of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) technologies, we can identify arguments that take issue with: specific aspects of the weapons themselves (such as their ability to target precisely); the character of an individual or society that uses these weapons; the ways in which these weapons can change the relationship between a combatant and his adversary; or the way that this technology creates new international norms or doctrines for the conduct of warfare. Thus, anti-drone arguments come in different variants, rely on differing assumptions, and lead to differing policy recommendations--from an absolute ban on their existence to a more nuanced set of guidelines for their creation and deployment. For a commander or planner who wishes to respond to ethical arguments being raised about drones, this Letort Paper can serve as a type of field guide, helping the decision-maker to identify the type of argument being made and the specific concerns which undergird this type of ethical thinking. Knowing this information, decision-makers are better equipped with specific responses to address these concerns.
Description
Loading Description...
Also in this Series
Checking series information...
Copies
Location | Format | Call Number | Status |
---|---|---|---|
Web Content | Online Content | Online | Available Online |
Yavapai College Prescott - GDU - Use Internet Link | Government Document | U.S. GOVERNMENT DOCUMENT | Find It Now |
Citations
APA Citation, 7th Edition (style guide)
Manjikian, M. (2017). A typology of arguments about drone ethics . Strategic Studies Institute and U.S. Army War College Press.
Chicago / Turabian - Author Date Citation, 17th Edition (style guide)Manjikian, Mary. 2017. A Typology of Arguments About Drone Ethics. Strategic Studies Institute and U.S. Army War College Press.
Chicago / Turabian - Humanities (Notes and Bibliography) Citation, 17th Edition (style guide)Manjikian, Mary. A Typology of Arguments About Drone Ethics Strategic Studies Institute and U.S. Army War College Press, 2017.
MLA Citation, 9th Edition (style guide)Manjikian, Mary. A Typology of Arguments About Drone Ethics Strategic Studies Institute and U.S. Army War College Press, 2017.
Note! Citations contain only title, author, edition, publisher, and year published. Citations should be used as a guideline and should be double checked for accuracy. Citation formats are based on standards as of August 2021.
Staff View
Loading Staff View.